{"id":837,"date":"2021-09-08T11:25:31","date_gmt":"2021-09-08T15:25:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/magazine.alumni.ncsu.edu\/?p=837"},"modified":"2024-02-01T15:39:22","modified_gmt":"2024-02-01T20:39:22","slug":"turning-to-twitter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/magazine.ncsu.edu\/2021\/turning-to-twitter\/","title":{"rendered":"Turning to Twitter"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

By Ramona Dubose<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

NC State researchers in the Poole College of Management are mining data from Twitter\u2009\u2014\u2009using keywords that correspond to symptoms\u2009\u2014\u2009to predict COVID-19 out-breaks, and have teamed up with the Clinton Health Access Initiative to predict hotspots in sub-Saharan Africa.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The results in the U.S. have been accurate more often than 24 other models, most of which rely on reports of prior cases, deaths and additional medical surveillance and survey results. The predictions are collected and reported by the CDC. Associate Professor William Rand, executive director of the college\u2019s Business Analytics Initiative, is leading the team that is building and using models that rely on keywords in tweets, analyzing how often people mention two or more symptoms of COVID-19 to predict future COVID-19 outbreaks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The tweets must list at least two words that the World Health Organization has identified as COVID-19 symptoms, such as fever, headache or chill. To improve the search, they included partial spellings and combinations of words, such as \u201clos\u201d AND \u201ctaste\u201d, \u201clos\u201d AND \u201csmell,\u201d picking up phrases like \u201clost ability to taste,\u201d and \u201closing my sense of smell.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rand and his team used tweets from all 50 states for their predictions, and in comparisons with 24 other models developed at other institutions, NC State\u2019s models most closely predicted outcomes more than 30% of the time. In comparison, the next most accurate models\u2009\u2014\u2009which included those from Johns Hopkins and UCLA\u2009\u2014\u2009were correct only about 12 percent of the time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n